What Does It Mean to Be A Country?

There were two conversations I had here a few months ago that have been ricocheting around in my brain ever since.  One was about being proud of our country, the USA, and the other was about some Ukrainians being cowards for trying to avoid conscription.

The point most frequently mentioned was that a country is more than the government that runs it. This is a very abstract notion that I think is worthy of throwing out there for a dedicated discussion. If a country isn’t an artifact defined by the territorial borders imposed by the government that controls it, then how do you define a country? A shared language? A shared culture? A shared race or ethnicity? A shared religion? Other shared belief systems?

I think the answer is probably some sort of murky combination of all of the above that varies from country to country. The heterogenous melting pot composition of America makes it especially prone to fracture, but the citizens were more or less united behind the beliefs of freedom, individuality, hard work, generosity, and an entrepreneurial/grit/frontier type spirit. I think these beliefs are what Americans generally mean when they say we’re proud of America.

Although these beliefs certainly do still prevail in discrete segments of the country, I just don’t see these beliefs as a part of America the country anymore. Do you still see that looking at the overall picture? We can point the finger at the government as the bad guy, but, at the end of the day, a significant part of America’s citizenry does not belief in freedom, independence, or entrepreneurism. The enthusiastic support for lockdowns, mandatory masking, and vaccine requirements put an end to any lingering debate about that. At least in my mind.

This doesn’t mean that I can’t be proud of my community. The businesses around me who risked their licenses by refusing to post mask signs or force employees to wear masks made me proud. The neighbors who help one another when tragedy strikes. I’d have many armed neighbors at my home, risking their lives with nothing asked in return, if trouble hit my family. And I for them. But these are the beliefs and culture that my community generally values. Many, many other communities in America find these beliefs repugnant. And they would be as out of place living here in my community, as I would be in their communities. The beliefs that form the American dream aren’t dead, per se, but I can no longer get behind the notion that these beliefs are an intrinsic part of modern-day America… this country is not a unified country with widely shared values, culture, and beliefs.

So I’ll ask again, what does it mean to be a country? What does Alabama have in common with New York or Washington besides the shared federal government? If you remove government from the definition of a country, what is left in common between the citizens of these regions? For a thought experiment, let’s say you had the omnipotent power to grant the people of each area of America the self-determination to choose remaining as part of the US, starting their own sovereign nation, or joining with other areas in starting new nations. If being a country is more than the government that controls it, then let’s remove any government-related concerns about national debt or splitting up the existing military … just use whatever factors you believe are important in determining what it means to be a country. How many different new nations would we be counting? Or do you think the shared beliefs/culture are strong enough that one country, the United States of America, would still emerge?

I’ll end this with the Ukraine conversation and the young men trying to escape conscription, but the Ukraine backdrop doesn’t really matter. I thought it would be interesting to apply this scenario to the United States as the basis for another thought experiment. How many of us would leave our families and homes to go fight for DC if the capitol was facing invasion? Do you really feel that strongly about protecting a government that hates you and wants you dead? I’ll be forthright in saying that I wouldn’t leave my community to defend the Bay Area, NYC, Chicago, or Baltimore if these regions were invaded by a hostile nation. These places might as well be hostile foreign nations themselves to people who share my values and belief systems (with apologies to the Glibs who live there). And I don’t mean that hyperbolically… Maryland actively seeks out Virginia gun owners who cross the state line for arrest and imprisonment.

The residents of my community have more in common with a Peruvian llama rancher living in the Andes than they do with the typical Bay Area resident. I would not allow myself or my children to be conscripted to defend California. But neither would I expect Bay Area technocrats to defend my community 3,000 miles away. I would take up arms without hesitation to defend my family, my home, my neighbors, and my community. Is that position cowardly? I do not feel that my community is the same as my country. At least not any longer.

What do you think it means to be a country, and do the people and regions that make up the United States still collectively fulfill that definition?