Part One

Day Two of FreedomFest 2022 was Thursday, July 14th. I skipped the early morning sessions. The first talks I attended were short format – 10 to 15 minutes. In the afternoon, there was one longer session and two movies at the Anthem Film Festival. In the early evening, I attended the mock trial on drug legalization. The day ended with some talks on the main stage.

Steve Perry

The first talk I attended was a twenty minute talk by Dr. Steve Perry on education choice. Near the beginning of his talk, he mentioned he is a father and said, “I am the person that decides how to educate my children.”

Perry stated government is very bad at providing goods and services. He gave several examples. Housing projects. The VA. Public Defenders. As a hypothetical, he asked the women in the audience if they’d see a government gynecologist. None of the women in the audience were interested in a government gynecologist.

Perry thinks that parents make better decisions about their children’s education than neighborhoods.

For solutions to the problem, Perry thinks vouchers are good. He likens them to the GI Bill. He also likes charter schools. Catholic schools are also a good choice.

One of the problems with making change is teachers’ unions oppose everything except throwing more money at the problem. Often, in many areas, education systems are the largest or one of the largest employers.

Aubrey De Gray

Aubrey De Gray gave a talk on anti-aging advancements.

Hygiene has eliminated many causes of death. Now, that we are living longer, we see more chronic conditions. De Gray thinks longevity is a side effect of being healthy. The goal is to live healthy, longer.

De Gray talked about aging and its effects on the body. He talked about the different approaches to problems with aging. Geriatrics is, in his opinion, too late. Gerontology is a good idea, but in his mind has a problem with complexity. De Gray’s preferred solution is to repair damage. De Gray made several analogies to keeping a classic car on the road. You perform preventative maintenance and repair damage when it occurs.

De Gray pointed attendees to two websites with more information:

Richard Mack

I arrived in the room Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officer Association was giving his talk. It was about halfway through his talk. I think he ran over his allotted time.

He was in the middle of talking about how sheriffs, being elected and the chief law enforcement officer in a county, will protect us if the sheriff enforces the Constitution. I’ve always thought this was similar to Sovereign Citizens. In other words, oversold bullshit. Sheriffs vary by state.

Alaska never had sheriffs. Connecticut abolished the office. Rhode Island, when the state abolished county government, kept the office of sheriff around but the sheriff only provides courtroom security. Rhode Island sheriffs are state government employees. The sheriff in some states is the chief law enforcement office of the county, and in others the sheriff is not. Some sheriffs departments, like the one for the county in Pennsylvania that I grew up and the one for the county in New Hampshire that I live in, don’t make use of their law enforcement powers. Some, like in Delaware, have no law enforcement powers.

Mack finished by switching to election security and speaking against voting machines. I tuned him out at this point.

Arthur Laffer

Arthur Laffer, of the Laffer Curve fame, talked about the effect of taxes. “Taxes have consequences” was how he described taxes.

Since 1960, 11 states introduced an income tax: Nebraska, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Michigan, and Maine.

Laffer had spent time analyzing economic metrics from each of these states and the other 39 states. He presented a summary of his analysis. In every one of these states, those metrics, after introduction of the income tax, declined relative to the rest of the country.

He went into detail for a few of the states. One of them was New Jersey, which was the boom state of the country until its government introduced an income tax. Laffer also commented about Jon Corzine, a former governor of New Jersey. According to Laffer, Corzine was a student of Laffer’s, and was a C student.

Laffer finished talking about these 11 states with one other analysis he did. He analyzed public services, specifically education. Two of those states outperformed the other 39 states, and the other nine underperformed by a lot.

Finally, Laffer said that if we have an income tax, it should have a low rate and a broad base.

Ben Stein

Ben Stein did not look well. His talk had nothing to do with the title in the program. The title in the program was “America Is Better Than Ever”.

He talked about joking not being allowed because it might offend people.

He digressed with a talk about a movie on evolution.

Then he went back to talking about people being offended. Stein talked about how he was once often called anti-Semitic slurs when he was younger. He concluded with saying he’d prefer “being called a kike than not having the First Amendment”.

He started talking about inflation. He compared the United States to Weimar Germany.

Stein ran over his allotted time. He thought he had an hour to speak. I think he confused this short talk with a lunch time talk he was giving later.

“The Hong Konger” Documentary

The Anthem Film Festival included a screening of “The Hong Konger” documentary. The documentary is about Jimmy Lai, who is in prison for speaking out against what the Chinese Communists are doing to Hong Kong. After the screening, there was a brief Q&A session with an associate of Jimmy Lai from Apple Daily. I cannot remember the name of the associate. I don’t remember if he appeared in the documentary. I did not write his name down.

The movie covers Jimmy Lai’s life from his time in Communist China through his life in Hong Kong to his activism which got him thrown in jail. One highlight that stood out to me is that he credits reading “The Road to Serfdom” by Friedrich Hayek as a pivotal moment in his life.

During the Q&A period, the only questions that I remember were on Jimmy Lai’s treatment in prison and Apple Daily.

Jimmy Lai is being held in solitary confinement. He gets to see his lawyer periodically, though I don’t remember how often. He gets to see his wife once a year. Otherwise, he has no contact with the outside world.

The question about Apply Daily was, “Why didn’t the people at Apply Daily move money into cryptocurrency and off-shore operations?”. Jimmy Lai’s associate said that there was an attempt to move assets offshore. The problem was some managers broke with Jimmy Lai to cooperate with the Hong Kong/Beijing authorities. They intended to shut everything down. The associate said that he worked with hackers to get some of Apple Daily’s articles and videos archived on servers outside of Hong Kong. He did not say where to access them. I searched, and I found this reddit post whose comments have links to various sites that appear to have information from Apple Daily. It’s possible some of these sites are the archives the associate was talking about.

Pandemics and Liberty

I attended a panel discussion called “Pandemics and Liberty”. The panelists were Phil Magness, Matt Kibbe, and James Herrigan. Ryan Yonk was the moderator. AIER sponsored the panel discussion.

Each panelist had a chance to talk about his own thoughts on governments’ response handling of Covid-19. Magness and Kibbe both talked about failures of central planning. Magness about how “two weeks to flatten the curve” wasn’t and how the Imperial College model was completely wrong. Kibbe talked about damage to supply chains and how central planners don’t know as much as they think they do. Herrigan talked about something different: presidential communication. Herrigan compared Woodrow Wilson during the Spanish Flu pandemic and Donald Trump during the Covid-19 insanity. Herrigan claims Wilson never said “flu” or “influenza” during the Spanish Flu outbreak. Herrigan was critical of Trump and others, including Anthony Fauci, for flip-flopping.

All panelists think something similar to the government’s reaction to Covid-19 will happen again. They were also critical of Libertarian groups for their lack of response to the government’s actions. None of the panelists named names.

Yonk started asking the panelists questions. I wrote down the questions and the answers. I did not write down who answered the questions, so I’ll simply say “the panel” answered the questions.

Yonk asked the panel if there is a best public policy response for pandemics, and if so, what is it. The panel said the government spread disinformation and the solution to disinformation is more transparency. The panel pointed out that the government suspended many rules and regulations. This shows we don’t need these rules and regulations. Those rules and regulations should be repealed.

The next question was “Is there anything that can justify draconian measures?” Then panel said whatever the government does has to work, and lockdowns did not.

Yonk next asked about statistics and comparisons between countries such as between Sweden and other countries. The only thing I have in my notes is that the panel talked about the Imperial College model being completely wrong.

This clueless straight guy suspects those that like looking at men will like this picture I found of Rainer Zitelmann taken from his website.

Life Behind The Berlin Wall

I attended a viewing of “Life Behind the Berlin Wall” which is a short educational video about East Berlin. Jim Taylor and Barb Potter were the producers. The film features Dr. Rainer Zitelmann. After the film, there was a Q&A session with Zitelmann.

The movie ran about twenty minutes. It was concise, and to the point. It gave a brief background on why Germany and Berlin were divided. Why the East German government built the Wall. It included interviews with people that grew up in East Berlin. It showed pictures of East Berlin under Communism compared with the same parts of East Berlin after Reunification. It includes period videos of East Berlin.

I did not take notes during the Q&A. I only remember one question. The question had nothing to do with the movie. It was a question about Zitelmann’s research into Adolf Hitler and his politics. Zitelmann had spent time reading every existing copy of Hitler’s speeches, letters, books, and other writings. Zitelmann came to the conclusion that Hitler was a man of the Left. You can only consider Hitler right-wing if you selectively quote from Hitler and ignore the vast body of Hitler’s thought.

Drug Legalization Mock Trial

Every year FreedomFest has a mock trial on some issue. It is a semi-serious debate with a trial format. This year’s mock trial was on drug legalization. The judge was Wayne Allyn Root. The prosecutor was arguing that drugs should be prohibited. Alex Datig played this role. The defense argued for drug legalization. Catherine Bernard argued for the defense. There were four witnesses, two for each side. Luke Niforatos and Marc Eliot for the prosecution, and Jim Gray and Avens O’Brien for the defense.

I arrived at the main stage about halfway through the trial. The prosecution was wrapping up its case.

I have no notes on the trial. I remember not being as impressed with this trial as I was with last year’s on the lockdowns.

The end of the prosecution’s case involved grilling whichever of their witnesses was on the stand about drug use among musicians. I’m not expecting a serious debate, but I was wondering how musician’s drug use and effect on the musician’s music matters to whether or not drug legalization is justified. This seemed frivolous to me.

When the defense started, Jim Gray’s testimony was quite interesting. He talked about seeing the negative effects of jail time on people convicted of drug crimes. I don’t remember Avens O’Brien’s testimony.

When all testimony was finish, the jury deliberated. The jury was made up of FreedomFest attendees who were willing to be open minded in judging both side’s arguments.

Drug Legalization, the defense, won.

Is Atheism Dead?

After the mock trial, there were more talks at the event’s main stage. I only have notes on two of them. The first of those two is a debate between Michael Shermer and Eric Metaxas moderated by Alex Green on whether or not the future of the liberty movement is secular. There were some introductory remarks from Thomas Sheedy. The introduction and debate lasted about 25 minutes. Shermer took the affirmative. Metaxas took the negative. This was not a debate with Oxford Rules. In other words, there was no scoring from the audience.

Metaxas went first. He opened with defending the notion that there is a god. He claims that science supports a god because things are far too fine tuned. How could life emerge from non-life?

Shermer’s rebuttal pointed out that much cannot be empirically knowable. Religion is just a placeholder for things we don’t currently know. He pivoted to say there really isn’t an “atheist movement”, so how can you say it is dead?

Metaxas responded by pointing out that Shermer’s rebuttal was just Shermer repeating himself.

Shermer got the final word. Which was that Metaxas is relying on an argument from authority with his referencing scientists that believe there is a god. Though I think Shermer shot himself in the foot with an argument ad popularum by talking about polls and then polling the audience.

There wasn’t much talk about the liberty movement throughout the debate.

School Choice

The final talk I attended on Thursday was Corey DeAngelis giving a brief interview with Betsy DeVos. DeAngelis initially called DeVos “Madame Secretary.” DeVos cut him off and said, “I am no longer Secretary of Education. Please don’t call me ‘Madame Secretary’. Call me ‘Betsy’.”

One of the topics was the government shutdown of schools in response to Covid-19. DeVos pointed out that it was the teachers’ unions that wanted to keep the schools closed. Many teachers’ unions did nothing about figuring out how to make distance learning work. Even with the problems with distance learning, parents got to see what their kids were actually learning. This, according to DeVos, is what helped Glen Youngkin win the Virginia gubernatorial election.

DeVos stated the Federal Department of Education should not exist. Every year she was Secretary of Education, she submitted budgets which turned Federal education spending into block grants to states, which would effectively end the Department of Education.

The talk moved towards education freedom accounts. These are spreading through the country. In 2021, 26 states expanded or created such programs. These programs encourage parents to buy education services. In other words, be a consumer that wants value from what he/she is purchasing.

DeAngelis and DeVos discussed recent and future elections. DeVos noted that anti-education freedom candidates are losing.

DeVos talked a bit about the Supreme Court and the huge win in the Maine case. She discussed the case. She said it is not a state religion issue because parents make the decision about where to send their kids. She talked about the Blaine Amendments and how they need to go away.

DeAngelis asked if teachers’ unions have done anything good? DeVos’ response is that teachers’ unions simply protect their power and resources.

The talk ended with DeVos’ advice on how to fight back. People need to pay attention to their local school board and state legislative elections. These are easier to influence than many think. DeVos also talked about education innovation, specifically learning pods.

Conclusion

This was a good day. The high points were the two films. I strongly suggest you watch both.

I’ll cover Friday in the next part. Friday was another big day. Maj Toure, John Cleese, Rand Paul, and Zuby were among the speakers I watched on Day Three.

I will write more soon.