No puzzle this week (sorry GT and Patzer). I have excuses but everyone has excuse, I’ll endeavor to persevere do better next week.

That said, Glibbook discussion this week – are you a completionist or completeist or whatever the right word is for someone who has to read every book by an author or in a series even if they stop being enjoyable? I was/am, I read the entire Repairman Jack/Adversary cycle, and oh man were the last five or six of those books just awful but I read them anyway. I like to think I’m past that now, but it’s a hard habit to break. I blame Alfred Hitchcock, one of the first series of books I read for my own enjoyment was his* “Three Detectives”, It’s a great marketing ploy- number the books and young nerds will be driven to complete the set. Then I moved on to Piers Anthony, fuck me, you could spend all the paper route money you earned and still not buy/read every one of his books (I tried) Xanth, Space Tyrant, Tarot, Incarnations… you get the idea. As I said I’m getting better, I don’t fall for the fantasy/sci-fi trap anymore,  Crime and mystery? that’s another story, I’ll still snap up any Ken Bruen novel and am working my way through Ian Rankin’s Rebus novels.

So fellow glibs, are there series you read even though the author lost the plot? are there authors you’ll read just because you’ve read everything else he/she/it wrote?

Bonus Question – What’s the longest (most books) series you’ve read without once thinking of bailing?

*Alfred Hitchcock had nothing to do with the books