The Hat and The Hair 47: Episode 48

by | May 6, 2026 | Sugarverse, The Hat and The Hair 47 | 105 comments

ā€œI love being hated,ā€ the hat said. ā€œThe retarded parts of the country hate me. They should. I’d kill them all if I could.ā€

ā€œThey hate Donald too,ā€ the hair said sleepily.

ā€œIt’s good to be hated by bad people,ā€ the hat said. ā€œI want to bathe in their agony and distress.ā€

ā€œSomeone’s coming,ā€ the hair said, climbing back on Donald’s head.

ā€œI was in the new ballroom,ā€ Donald mumbled. ā€œIt was beautiful, so classy.ā€

ā€œFather,ā€ Barron said. ā€œI ordered them to fill the reflecting pool with alligators from my farm and they refused.ā€

ā€œBut I want there to be alligators too,ā€ Donald said. He stood, and went around the desk to put a comforting hand on his giant son’s arm.

ā€œDid I ever tell you about the best grapefruit I ever fucked?ā€ the hat asked.

ā€œWhat about the moat I want to build around the ballroom?ā€ Donald asked. ā€œI want to feed protesters to them.ā€

ā€œThe engineers are grumbling about that as well,ā€ Barron said.

ā€œGoddamn, she was juicy,ā€ the hat said.

ā€œFather, I worry that there won’t be any alligators stocked in DC at all,ā€ Barron said, slumping.

ā€œHow are we going to protect ourselves from assassins?ā€ Barron asked.

ā€œA Ruby Red, deep pink inside,ā€ the hat reminisced.

ā€œThere will always be assassins,ā€ the hair said. ā€œBut reassure the boy.ā€

ā€œBarron,ā€ Donald said, ā€œthey want to destroy me, my legacy.ā€

ā€œYou know I like that pink,ā€ the hat said. ā€œHmm… yeah.ā€

ā€œIsn’t the reflecting pool chlorinated?ā€ the hair asked.

ā€œGet in there, part a section, just go to town.ā€

Barron asked, ā€œAre you all right Father? You seem distracted.ā€

ā€œRub that peel all over me,ā€ the hat said.

ā€œWe are talking about alligators, for fuck’s sake,ā€ the hair said to the hat.

ā€œPut it in the stem end,ā€ the hat said, ā€œthe stem end is tight.ā€

ā€œOK, maybe no alligators,ā€ Donald said. ā€œCould we ring the ballroom with land mines?ā€

ā€œI am so erect right now,ā€ the hat said. ā€œCall up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.ā€

ā€œLand mines are illegal, Donald,ā€ the hair said primly.

ā€œI decide what is legal,ā€ Donald said out loud. ā€œLand mines, I want land mines, get Hegseth in here.ā€

ā€œNo bananas, that’s gay,ā€ the hat said.

Donald made explosion noises for a full minute.

About The Author

SugarFree

SugarFree

Your Resident Narcissistic Misogynist Rape-Culture Apologist

105 Comments

  1. Furthest Blue pistoffnick (370HSSV)

    The hat has wedding tackle?

    • Not Adahn

      Millinery tackle.

    • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

      So that’s what tickles my ears.

    • juris imprudent

      Skull fuck just took on a whole new meaning.

  2. The Late P Brooks

    When does Godot arrive?

    • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

      Wait for it…

    • rhywun

      Or “illegal”.

      Donald’s say-so is more authoritative than some stupid treaty.

    • R.J.

      We are just collecting them so nobody else can use them.

      • Sean

        We sent a bunch to Ukraine.

    • WTF

      They’re not illegal:

      The United States has not signed or ratified the 1997 Ottawa Convention (the Mine Ban Treaty)

      The Biden administration chose to comply with most of its general terms, but the US is under no obligation to do so.

  3. R.J.

    ā€œCall up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.ā€

    If I had a dime for every time I heard that…

  4. The Late P Brooks

    ā€œFather,ā€ Barron said. ā€œI ordered them to fill the reflecting pool with alligators from my farm and they refused.ā€

    Off with their heads.

    • Threedoor

      The pools pretty shallow. A bunch of baby alligators in it would be super cute.

  5. EvilSheldon

    ā€œCall up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.ā€

    ā€œLand mines are illegal, Donald,ā€

    Please do not fuck the land mines.

    • UnCivilServant

      He wanted to have a blast. Was that so wrong?

      • EvilSheldon

        Not wrong so much as ill-advised.

    • Furthest Blue pistoffnick (370HSSV)

      Anything is a sex toy if you are brave enough…

    • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

      Talk about going out with a bang.

    • Gustave Lytton

      Tilt rodded for his pleasure.

    • Nephilium

      Front Toward Enemy

  6. juris imprudent

    Donald made explosion noises for a full minute.

    So Michael Bay to produce and direct the bio-pic?

    • kinnath

      It would be just as truthful as what any other director would do.

    • SugarFree

      “Welcome to the Fuck Tunnels,” Sean Connery growled.

      • Swiss Servator

        Wannafud II – this time it’s personal!

      • Gustave Lytton

        “Winners get to go home and fuck the prom queenvote on procedural motions.”

  7. The Late P Brooks

    New talking point

    In response, civil rights groups and other Americans committed to democracy should consider more proportional voting systems that can reduce gerrymandering and make representation less dependent on judicial intervention. Under a typical proportional system, if a group wins, say, one-third of the vote, it could expect to secure roughly one-third of the legislative seats.

    Critically, all voters’ ballots could count toward electing a representative — no matter where they live — because politicians could not dilute a community’s political power by spreading them across multiple districts, or by packing them into a single district. In Louisiana, for example, where the population is one-third Black, proportional representation could better enable Black Louisianans to help elect at least two of the six members of the state’s congressional delegation.

    ——-

    Rather than enabling entrenched politicians to gerrymander district lines to shut out disfavored voters, proportional systems would translate votes into seats more faithfully, producing legislatures that better reflect the electorate and are more responsive.

    Make no mistake, the Supreme Court’s unbridled assault on the Voting Rights Act threatens the future of multiracial democracy in America. It reflects a broader struggle over whether our public institutions will adapt to a more diverse nation, or whether those anxious about cultural and political change will use immigration restrictions, English-only mandates, attacks on diversity programs, book bans and other efforts to erase our history to resist that transformation.

    There was another article like this a day or two ago. Racialist preferences can be rescued via incomprehensible nonsense about how we can end-run gerrymandering restrictions with some weird redheaded bastard love child of ranked choice and outright racial quotas.

    Long live Democrat-ocracy.

    • The Other Kevin

      As always, the definition of “fair” is “my side wins”.

    • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

      Aren’t geographical districts written into the Constitution? Funny that the article doesn’t mention that.

      • juris imprudent

        No as a matter of fact, they are not. Each state is allocated a number of representatives based on the census, and the number is capped by statute, not constitutional clause. The constitution is silent on apportionment beyond that.

      • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

        I did not know that. I still have a hard time seeing the majority in any state change the law in a way that would weaken their representation.

      • juris imprudent

        And thus from early MA Democrat Gov. Elbridge Gerry – the gerrymander.

    • EvilSheldon

      Yet another lame attempt to sidestep the problem (the short-term problem, of course, is that Democrats cheat in elections and we’re not holding them accountable.)

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        it isn’t cheating if you write it into law!

        /some prog, somewhere.

    • Not Adahn

      If they weren’t bitching about the gerrymander in NE states, they can go fuck themselves.

    • rhywun

      Define “group”.

      Oh, a couple lines down they explicitly say it means “race”.

      No — GFY.

    • Threedoor

      Repeal the 17th.

  8. Gender Traitor

    O/T Breaking News/Ray of Sunshine for Every Day: Dayton, Ohio’s Boonshoft Museum of Discovery presents the 24/7 Otter Cam!!!😃🦦🦦

    Reportedly most active 9-11 a.m. and 3-5 p.m. US Eastern time.

    • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

      Is that what they are trying to outlaw in Texas?

  9. The Late P Brooks

    ā€œWelcome to the Fuck Tunnels,ā€ Sean Connery growled.

    I just watched that recently. What a colossally dopey movie.

    *The Rock

    • juris imprudent

      Michael Bay AND Nic Cage – the nearly concentric Venn diagram of vapid movie making.

    • UnCivilServant

      I thought he was already dead.

    • kinnath

      There was a time when CNN was actually pretty great.

      But in the end it just devolved into propaganda but not before destroying the established network news organizations thus leaving everyone worse off than before CNN existed.

      • R.J.

        Turner Classic Movies was great when that channel came out.

      • Rat on a train

        CNN was a great excuse for battalion to subscribe to cable. I then had access to all those channels when on staff duty for 24 hours.

      • Threedoor

        TV on staff duty?
        We would bring the OG X box.

      • Rat on a train

        It was early 90s.

      • Gustave Lytton

        Eh, the establishment news organizations were just mouthpieces for the uniparty/ruling class social circle.

    • Threedoor

      When do we celebrate Ralph Nader?

      • kinnath

        Why? For killing the Corvair?

  10. The Late P Brooks

    Each state is allocated a number of representatives based on the census, and the number is capped by statute, not constitutional clause. The constitution is silent on apportionment beyond that.

    I would not be opposed, in theory, to statewide elections for Congress, but what is being proposed seems to be motivated by an explicit desire for race quotas. California could, in theory, get a few more Republicans if voters weren’t corralled in electoral Bantustans.

    • kinnath

      Quadruple the size of the house. Reduce district sizes and confine them to compact, geographical shapes. Simple direct voting rules including proof of identity and proof of residency to vote. Representation is whatever you get.

      • Not Adahn

        Along with that:

        HoR wing of the Capitol shut down. Representatives work remotely from an office in their district.

      • juris imprudent

        Some states early on did non-district based Congressional reps. I like that as much as increasing the size of the House. District based representation may have made sense before our era of modern communications, not so much now.

        I disagree with NA – this is politics and that requires political skills/behavior and that means face to face interaction. I don’t like it and I’d never want to do it, but that’s just reality and I have to accept that.

      • Not Adahn

        this is politics and that requires political skills/behavior and that means face to face interaction.

        To the extent that this was ever true, it’s definitely less true among the “don’t call me without texting first” generation. Besides, the entire point of increasing the number of reps would be to reduce the power of charismatic leaders. And keeping them local keeps their in-group the people in their district, rather than their party or the HoR as an institution. It also makes lobbying a fuckton more expensive.

        Also, remote work means all the horsetrading gets documented.

      • UnCivilServant

        remote work means all the horsetrading gets documented.

        šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£

      • kinnath

        Graft would become a more expensive problem for those seeking to pay for influence — four times as many representative — mostly like four times as many committees and committee leads — etc.

        And I do expect that geographic diversity would force more graft into electronic communications instead of hallway conversations. So, there would be an evidence trail for people to chase after if they wanted to.

      • Not Adahn

        Of course since mass electronic communication is a thing, you could just eliminate the HoR and go with a plebiscite for the functions of that part of the legislature.

      • kinnath

        go with a plebiscite

        no

        voter referendums already prove that’s a bad idea.

      • Gustave Lytton

        Just dilute the house and make it even more a creature of the deep state. Like term limits, it sounds better on paper than in practice.

      • Not Adahn

        I am more than halfway convinced that the electoral process actively selects for worse people than the general population. And you would need to provide actual evidence that it results in a legislature any smarter than the mean.

      • juris imprudent

        the ā€œdon’t call me without texting firstā€ generation

        Which generation is that? Not my son’s generation that much I know.

      • Gustave Lytton

        For one, you have people that want to elected, rather than better things to do with their lives.

      • juris imprudent

        And you would need to provide actual evidence that it results in a legislature any smarter than the mean.

        +1 Buckley quote about being governed by the first 100 names in the phone book

  11. Sensei

    “What we ā€Œare proposing ⁠is that Iran gains passage for its ships through the Strait and in return commits to negotiating with the Americans on issues of nuclear materials, missiles, and the region, and we propose that the Americans, for their part, lift their blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and, in return, obtain Iran’s commitment to negotiations,” the French presidency official said.

    So the US stops the only thing that gives it any leverage and the Iran pinky swears to “commit” to negotiations. We will see has desperate the Orange Man is to get himself out of his mess.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/french-aircraft-carrier-group-moving-into-red-sea-gulf-aden-2026-05-06/

    • UnCivilServant

      “We didn’t forge it – in fact, we are Banksy” – take the vandalism charges to avoid the forgery felony. Unless that piece of shit comes out of hiding and takes the rap for his crimes.

    • rhywun

      Fuck.

      Off.

    • EvilSheldon

      As humanity edges closer to irreversible climate damage,…

      And I’m out. Before the first sentence is complete, no less.

    • Rat on a train

      Have they checked the hobbies of the poor?

    • juris imprudent

      I can partially agree – particularly as it applies to Davos man.

    • rhywun

      Piker has a boy-next-door appeal

      I don’t remember the appealing boy next door being a radical communist advocating violent crime. I am so behind the times.

      • R.J.

        You are so 1992, Rhywun. Get with the times.

    • EvilSheldon

      Sadly I don’t live next door to a $3million pad in Brentwood.

      Really not sad. Because if I did, Pikey might have already been found hanging from his shower head with his dick in his hand and a bunch of loli porn on his phone (in Roblox, of course!)

  12. The Late P Brooks

    Rich white men’s jobs, diets and hobbies found to be ā€˜bad for the planet’

    I never saw that coming.

    • Rat on a train

      My wife feeds the hate birds at a local pond. She complains that seagulls sometimes ruin the experience.

  13. Gustave Lytton

    No alligators? What kind of piss poor swamp is that place?

  14. Sean

    https://www.meninkilts.com/

    Wut?

    Professional gutter cleaning, pressure washing, house washing, and more

    • R.J.

      Thanks. I passed that on to Bethannica.

    • Gender Traitor

      Not to put too fine a point on it, but for some of those jobs, they’d have to climb ladders…

      • kinnath

        Not according to the photos. They use extended scrubbers that let them keep their feet on the ground. I imagine that is critical to being able to afford business insurance.

      • Gender Traitor

        Even to clean the gutters?

      • PutridMeat

        Even to clean the gutters?

        These euphemisms.

      • kinnath

        Our residential and commercial cleaning specialists are equipped with cutting-edge tools that tackle the toughest jobs with ease. Here’s a peek at our toolkit.

        Extreme close-up gutter cameras: These bad boys allow us to see the condition of your gutters with a great degree of detail. That helps us provide accurate inspections, quotes, and quality checks. With gutter cameras, we can identify deformities and clogs. We’ve even found a few critters!

        Gutter vacuums: Just because we’re tough doesn’t mean we’re unsafe. That’s why we use gutter vacuums. In places where a ladder would be risky or impossible we rig carbon fiber poles to a high-quality wet/dry vacuum to remove even the smallest bits of debris. When we’re done, we’ll use our gutter cameras to ensure we got every last particle.

        Implies they do use them when they can, but they have other options as well.

      • R.J.

        Bethannica was disappointed by the fact she could not put them on ladders.

  15. Ted S.

    It’s hard to win a football game when the other team is allowed to use their hands.

    • Raven Nation

      FWIW: this is the BBC’s response:

      “Dale Johnson
      Football issues correspondent

      ‘There’s a little known exemption within the handball law.

      It covers when the ball is unexpectedly hit at you by a team-mate. Even if your arm is away from your body, the law says you should not give away a penalty.

      When Vitinha blasts the ball clear, could Joao Neves think the ball would be hit straight at him? ‘”

    • Rat on a train

      Try to win handball without using your feet.