The Hat and The Hair 47: Episode 48

by | May 6, 2026 | Sugarverse, The Hat and The Hair 47 | 60 comments

“I love being hated,” the hat said. “The retarded parts of the country hate me. They should. I’d kill them all if I could.”

“They hate Donald too,” the hair said sleepily.

“It’s good to be hated by bad people,” the hat said. “I want to bathe in their agony and distress.”

“Someone’s coming,” the hair said, climbing back on Donald’s head.

“I was in the new ballroom,” Donald mumbled. “It was beautiful, so classy.”

“Father,” Barron said. “I ordered them to fill the reflecting pool with alligators from my farm and they refused.”

“But I want there to be alligators too,” Donald said. He stood, and went around the desk to put a comforting hand on his giant son’s arm.

“Did I ever tell you about the best grapefruit I ever fucked?” the hat asked.

“What about the moat I want to build around the ballroom?” Donald asked. “I want to feed protesters to them.”

“The engineers are grumbling about that as well,” Barron said.

“Goddamn, she was juicy,” the hat said.

“Father, I worry that there won’t be any alligators stocked in DC at all,” Barron said, slumping.

“How are we going to protect ourselves from assassins?” Barron asked.

“A Ruby Red, deep pink inside,” the hat reminisced.

“There will always be assassins,” the hair said. “But reassure the boy.”

“Barron,” Donald said, “they want to destroy me, my legacy.”

“You know I like that pink,” the hat said. “Hmm… yeah.”

“Isn’t the reflecting pool chlorinated?” the hair asked.

“Get in there, part a section, just go to town.”

Barron asked, “Are you all right Father? You seem distracted.”

“Rub that peel all over me,” the hat said.

“We are talking about alligators, for fuck’s sake,” the hair said to the hat.

“Put it in the stem end,” the hat said, “the stem end is tight.”

“OK, maybe no alligators,” Donald said. “Could we ring the ballroom with land mines?”

“I am so erect right now,” the hat said. “Call up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.”

“Land mines are illegal, Donald,” the hair said primly.

“I decide what is legal,” Donald said out loud. “Land mines, I want land mines, get Hegseth in here.”

“No bananas, that’s gay,” the hat said.

Donald made explosion noises for a full minute.

About The Author

SugarFree

SugarFree

Your Resident Narcissistic Misogynist Rape-Culture Apologist

60 Comments

  1. Furthest Blue pistoffnick (370HSSV)

    The hat has wedding tackle?

  2. The Late P Brooks

    When does Godot arrive?

    • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

      Wait for it…

    • rhywun

      Or “illegal”.

      Donald’s say-so is more authoritative than some stupid treaty.

    • R.J.

      We are just collecting them so nobody else can use them.

      • Sean

        We sent a bunch to Ukraine.

    • WTF

      They’re not illegal:

      The United States has not signed or ratified the 1997 Ottawa Convention (the Mine Ban Treaty)

      The Biden administration chose to comply with most of its general terms, but the US is under no obligation to do so.

  3. R.J.

    “Call up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.”

    If I had a dime for every time I heard that…

  4. The Late P Brooks

    “Father,” Barron said. “I ordered them to fill the reflecting pool with alligators from my farm and they refused.”

    Off with their heads.

  5. EvilSheldon

    “Call up the kitchen, I want something to fuck.”

    “Land mines are illegal, Donald,”

    Please do not fuck the land mines.

      • EvilSheldon

        Not wrong so much as ill-advised.

    • Furthest Blue pistoffnick (370HSSV)

      Anything is a sex toy if you are brave enough…

    • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

      Talk about going out with a bang.

  6. juris imprudent

    Donald made explosion noises for a full minute.

    So Michael Bay to produce and direct the bio-pic?

    • kinnath

      It would be just as truthful as what any other director would do.

    • SugarFree

      “Welcome to the Fuck Tunnels,” Sean Connery growled.

      • Swiss Servator

        Wannafud II – this time it’s personal!

  7. The Late P Brooks

    New talking point

    In response, civil rights groups and other Americans committed to democracy should consider more proportional voting systems that can reduce gerrymandering and make representation less dependent on judicial intervention. Under a typical proportional system, if a group wins, say, one-third of the vote, it could expect to secure roughly one-third of the legislative seats.

    Critically, all voters’ ballots could count toward electing a representative — no matter where they live — because politicians could not dilute a community’s political power by spreading them across multiple districts, or by packing them into a single district. In Louisiana, for example, where the population is one-third Black, proportional representation could better enable Black Louisianans to help elect at least two of the six members of the state’s congressional delegation.

    ——-

    Rather than enabling entrenched politicians to gerrymander district lines to shut out disfavored voters, proportional systems would translate votes into seats more faithfully, producing legislatures that better reflect the electorate and are more responsive.

    Make no mistake, the Supreme Court’s unbridled assault on the Voting Rights Act threatens the future of multiracial democracy in America. It reflects a broader struggle over whether our public institutions will adapt to a more diverse nation, or whether those anxious about cultural and political change will use immigration restrictions, English-only mandates, attacks on diversity programs, book bans and other efforts to erase our history to resist that transformation.

    There was another article like this a day or two ago. Racialist preferences can be rescued via incomprehensible nonsense about how we can end-run gerrymandering restrictions with some weird redheaded bastard love child of ranked choice and outright racial quotas.

    Long live Democrat-ocracy.

    • The Other Kevin

      As always, the definition of “fair” is “my side wins”.

    • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

      Aren’t geographical districts written into the Constitution? Funny that the article doesn’t mention that.

      • juris imprudent

        No as a matter of fact, they are not. Each state is allocated a number of representatives based on the census, and the number is capped by statute, not constitutional clause. The constitution is silent on apportionment beyond that.

      • JaimeRoberto feckful & gruntled

        I did not know that. I still have a hard time seeing the majority in any state change the law in a way that would weaken their representation.

      • juris imprudent

        And thus from early MA Democrat Gov. Elbridge Gerry – the gerrymander.

    • EvilSheldon

      Yet another lame attempt to sidestep the problem (the short-term problem, of course, is that Democrats cheat in elections and we’re not holding them accountable.)

      • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

        it isn’t cheating if you write it into law!

        /some prog, somewhere.

    • Not Adahn

      If they weren’t bitching about the gerrymander in NE states, they can go fuck themselves.

    • rhywun

      Define “group”.

      Oh, a couple lines down they explicitly say it means “race”.

      No — GFY.

  8. Gender Traitor

    O/T Breaking News/Ray of Sunshine for Every Day: Dayton, Ohio’s Boonshoft Museum of Discovery presents the 24/7 Otter Cam!!!😃🦦🦦

    Reportedly most active 9-11 a.m. and 3-5 p.m. US Eastern time.

    • ZWAK, doktor of BRAIN SCIENCE!

      Is that what they are trying to outlaw in Texas?

  9. The Late P Brooks

    “Welcome to the Fuck Tunnels,” Sean Connery growled.

    I just watched that recently. What a colossally dopey movie.

    *The Rock

    • kinnath

      There was a time when CNN was actually pretty great.

      But in the end it just devolved into propaganda but not before destroying the established network news organizations thus leaving everyone worse off than before CNN existed.

      • R.J.

        Turner Classic Movies was great when that channel came out.

  10. The Late P Brooks

    Each state is allocated a number of representatives based on the census, and the number is capped by statute, not constitutional clause. The constitution is silent on apportionment beyond that.

    I would not be opposed, in theory, to statewide elections for Congress, but what is being proposed seems to be motivated by an explicit desire for race quotas. California could, in theory, get a few more Republicans if voters weren’t corralled in electoral Bantustans.

    • kinnath

      Quadruple the size of the house. Reduce district sizes and confine them to compact, geographical shapes. Simple direct voting rules including proof of identity and proof of residency to vote. Representation is whatever you get.

      • Not Adahn

        Along with that:

        HoR wing of the Capitol shut down. Representatives work remotely from an office in their district.

      • juris imprudent

        Some states early on did non-district based Congressional reps. I like that as much as increasing the size of the House. District based representation may have made sense before our era of modern communications, not so much now.

        I disagree with NA – this is politics and that requires political skills/behavior and that means face to face interaction. I don’t like it and I’d never want to do it, but that’s just reality and I have to accept that.

  11. Sensei

    “What we ‌are proposing ⁠is that Iran gains passage for its ships through the Strait and in return commits to negotiating with the Americans on issues of nuclear materials, missiles, and the region, and we propose that the Americans, for their part, lift their blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and, in return, obtain Iran’s commitment to negotiations,” the French presidency official said.

    So the US stops the only thing that gives it any leverage and the Iran pinky swears to “commit” to negotiations. We will see has desperate the Orange Man is to get himself out of his mess.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/french-aircraft-carrier-group-moving-into-red-sea-gulf-aden-2026-05-06/

    • rhywun

      Piker has a boy-next-door appeal

      I don’t remember the appealing boy next door being a radical communist advocating violent crime. I am so behind the times.

Submit a Comment